🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.