🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. HDHP. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? You should be. Who understands all this stuff? Not the typical business owner. Nor the typical worker. Selecting the right medical coverage for our business – or for households – seems like it requires advanced expertise in medical insurance.

Our Medical System Isn't Just Complex, It's Expensive

According to recent research, typical households pays $27,000 each year on medical coverage (increasing by 6% compared to last year). Typical company healthcare expense is expected to surpass $17,000 for each worker in 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Currently federal operations has ceased functioning due to political disagreements regarding subsidies which analysts predict could cause a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

How soon might we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I'm convinced we're approaching that point since this can't continue.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare program – an established insurance framework – simply expand to cover everyone. Our infrastructure remains intact. The way medical professionals receive payment changes. Trust me, they'll adapt.

The Way National Health Insurance Could Function

A national health insurance program would need contributions from both employees and employers. In similar programs, a worker earning moderate income must contribute approximately 5.3% to their healthcare. Their employer must contribute approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem expensive? Not if you contrast that with what the typical US resident spends. I know multiple businesses that are routinely paying between 8% to 15% of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. Remember that with inclusive programs, these contributions also cover retirement benefits, illness coverage, maternity leave and unemployment benefits along with funding healthcare facilities. When including these expenses compared with what we pay on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Execution for America

In the US, universal healthcare funding would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a framework already established. It should be means-based – those at higher income levels would pay more than lower-income earners. This includes both an employee and company payments. Similar to many federal military, IT, social programs and infrastructure, the program should be outsourced by private contractors instead of federal agencies.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage would be a huge benefit for entrepreneurs like mine. It would put us on a level playing field against big corporations that can pay for superior coverage. It would make management much easier (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to retirement and healthcare taxes, rather than separate payments to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would make simpler for us to budget annual expenditures, rather than enduring the complicated (and fruitless) process of bargaining with major insurers that we must do each year. Because it's simplified, there would be a better understanding of coverage among workers – as opposed to existing arrangements which require them to interpret the complications of current options. Additionally there would certainly be reduced responsibility for employers since we wouldn't would be privy to workers' health histories for purposes of weighing risks and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as possible. But I've learned that public institutions play important functions in society, from providing defense to supporting needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare for everyone through a national insurance system enhances our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, simpler approach for small businesses that employ more than half of American employees and fund half of our GDP. It makes it possible employees to be healthier, come to work more often and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Exist a million considerations I haven't covered? Certainly. But with all the healthcare cost increases experienced in recent years, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act is not working very well. I understand that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms are easier to implement. However extending universal Medicare, despite increased taxation required, would still be a superior and more affordable strategy both for controlling healthcare costs but providing access to everyone.

Need for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, must reduce national pride. America's medical care isn't exceptional. The US places well below many other countries with the best healthcare globally, according to comprehensive research. Perhaps a bright spot amid current situation could be that we take serious examination at ourselves and agree that major reforms are necessary.